How to prepare an application
- Overview of Application Types and Committees
- Summary of Barwon Health Research Oversight
- Authorisation and Document Requirements for New Single-Site Applications (please see the Guidelines and advice webpage)
- New Researcher Checklist
Applying for a Barwon Health Reference Number
All applications submitted to Barwon Health for review are required to generate a reference number via the Barwon Health Research Reference Number Generator (please open with Google Chrome).
Please ensure that the Barwon Health reference number is quoted at the time of your submission.
When does a research project require ethics committee review?
Most research involving humans will require ethics oversight of some kind, the level of which will be dependent on the risk of research being undertaken.
The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NS), Section 5.1, states that research which is no more than low risk research (including Qualitative Assurance (QA) projects and negligible risk research), 'must be reviewed by people who are familiar with the NS and have an understanding of the ethical issues that can arise; and have due regard to privacy regulations (laws) and is reviewed to ensure that it does not require review by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)'.
Many QA and negligible risk projects can be exempted from full HREC review, however these will be reviewed by the REGI Unit with advice from the Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) where appropriate.
Projects submitted to the REGI Unit for review will be assessed to determine whether or not the project:
- Qualifies for the exemption from ethics committee review; and
- Meets the requirements of all applicable legislation, codes of practice, and Barwon Health policy.
Projects that are accepted as exempt from ethics committee review will be approved out of session and ratified by the Barwon Health HREC.
Any project that is not exempt, must be submitted for committee review.
Which projects are exempt from ethics committee review?
Ethics committee review may not be necessary and projects may be eligible for an exemption from full HREC review, where the research involves only:
- The use of existing collections of data that contain only non-identifiable data about humans - 'non-identifiable data is data that has never been labelled with individual identifiers or from which identifiers have been permanently removed, and by means of which no specific individual can be identified. A subset of non-identifiable data is one that can be linked with other data so it can be known they are about the same data subject, although the person's identity remains unknown'
- The use of information that would ordinarily be collected as part of patient management from a patient, either in person or through a survey/questionnaire
- Negligible risk - 'negligible risk is where there is no foreseeable risk or harm or discomfort; and any foreseeable risk is no more than inconvenience. Where the risk, even if unlikely, is more than inconvenience, the research is not negligible risk'
- Does not involve the collection of new raw data, sensitive information, identifying information, or external researchers; and
- Is not instigated by an external person.
Which projects are not exempt from ethics committee review?
The NHMRC's advice on QA and audit activities, as outlined below, states that where one or more of the triggers below apply, ethical review should be sought::
- Where the activity potentially infringes the privacy or professional reputation of participants, providers, or organisations
- Secondary use of data (using data or analysis from QA or evaluation activities for another purpose)
- Gathering information about the participant beyond that which is collected routinely (information may include bio-specimens or additional investigations)
- Testing of non-standard (innovative) protocols or equipment
- Comparison of cohorts
- Randomisation or the use of control groups or placebos; and
- Targeted analysis of data involving minority/vulnerable groups.
Where ethical review by a HREC is not required, the REGI Unit will provide a statement which affirms that an alternative approach to ethical review was considered to be appropriate for the specific QA/evaluation activity.
How to apply for exemption from ethics committee review
If you think your research is exempt from ethics committee review, please view the negligible risk application guide, found on the Audits, QA & Negligible risk applications webpage, and follow the steps in order to apply.
Low/negligible risk projects (that are not exempt from ethics committee review)
Low risk research is where the only foreseeable risk is one of discomfort. Where the risk, even if unlikely, is more serious than discomfort, the research is not low risk.
If the research does not meet the requirement for exemption from ethics committee review, and is negligible or low risk, your project will be reviewed by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). More information on how the low risk application process can be found here.
Research that involves greater than low risk research
Greater than low risk research is where the foreseeable risk is greater than that of discomfort.
For all research that involves greater than low risk, full ethical review by the HREC is required as well as out of session review by the Research Review Committee (RRC). The RRC will review the application based on scientific merit, methodological integrity and to make recommendations to the HREC. More information on the application process for greater than low risk research can be found here.
Last Modified: Tuesday, 26 February 2019